NET

Port at ATHs. (Despite being net short all year). AMA.

The 3x leveraged short Nasdaq 100 ETF, $SQQQ, saw +$12 BILLION in net inflows on Thursday, the largest daily inflow on record in data going back to 2010.

>📊 LATEST: Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF net flows turned positive on Friday, with BTC EFTs seeing $238.4 million in net inflows and ETH ETFs seeing $55.7 million — reversing an 8-day red streak for the Ethereum products. Source: [https://x.com/CoinMarketCap/status/1992305864959554013](https://x.com/CoinMarketCap/status/1992305864959554013)

At least you didn't lose 10x that amount, not to mention you still have that 100k in net worth. That's a lot more than a lot of people here have.

The stock market broke me. I made 70k profits in 3 months and lost everything again this week alone. Still back to break even on my net worth. Countless hours of trading and feeling like on top of the world, all for nothing. Its currently my hardest time of my 30yr old life. Can barely sleep or eat and hate myself a lot. Net worth went from 100k to 170k and back down to 100k

"If the hyperscalers decided to lever their balance sheets to 2.8x net debt to EBITDA (the median for an investment grade company), it could result in an additional $1 trillion of capital to spend." Say whaaaa

What net worth would you want to be at before contributing back to society and donating wealth?

I just inverse sentiment. I bought puts today when everyone was bullish at \~664. It faceplanted on that - net +95k! Then everyone started turning a little ghey so I figured - that must mean calls next week

Send me an intro thread on twitter plz. Surprised I've never come across this from the guys I've browsed. [nitter.net](http://nitter.net) format.

those reporters were an actual net negative for society

Immediately papered my 0DTE calls lol. I don't trust this market. I'm walking with my net 70k from them and fucking off for the day. One of the better Friday's I've had in a while (GAP, PFE, 0DTE's). GL2All

I miss the records/poster store in Bergenfield. Positions TSLA, NET and TLT, yes I am old as dirt.

My net worth went down by 10% this past month. Wbu?

Daaamn buttcoin net sending a good signal. MSTR bols LMAO

All I wanted was to 10x my net worth by clicking a few buttons. WHY IS THE UNIVERSE SO UNFAIR!? 😭 😭😭

it is funny how trading works. at the start of the month i had 110k. i went up to 116k and i was extremely happy. after that i went up to 122k and i got destroyed yesterday and i am at 116k. now i am sad. but if i was slowly gaining money from 110 k to 116 k i would still be happy. the end amount is the same but emotions are not. by logic i am still ok because i am net up on the month but my head fucks with me

realistically lets say market opens tom and I buy 1000 worth of TSLA 0dte puts at .3 delta and 1000 worth of 0dte calls for 0.3 delta. whats the chance one of them will go at least 2x and other one to 0 so overall trade is net profitable?

Just looked at post-market. GUH! S&P -1.64%. NASDAQ -2.62%. I'm cash gang since last Friday (and up net 1% on options plays during that phase), but it is hard to decide when to pull trigger on re-entry.

Of course the market is fleeing into the safety net of GLD.

It is smart to crash it right before Thanksgiving. It gives people the chance to strengthen their family ties and their social safety net before their imminent job loss and economic devastation. Strong family bonds and cold weather= less riots.

I asked AI what was nvda’s quarterly profit and here is what it said: “NVIDIA's net income (profit) for the most recent quarter, the third quarter of fiscal year 2026, was $31.9 billion.” It doesn’t even know what year it is?!

Walmart Q3'26 Earnings Highlights 🔹 Revenue: $179.5B (Est. $177.45B) 🟢; UP +5.8% YoY 🔹 Adj EPS: $0.62 (Est. $0.60) 🟢; UP +6.9% YoY 🔹 U.S. Comp Sales: +4.5% (Est. +3.8%) 🟢 FY'26 Guide: 🔹 Adj EPS: $2.58–$2.63 (Est. $2.61) 🟡 🔹 Net Sales Growth (cc): +4.8%–5.1% (Prior +3.75%–4.75%) 🟢 🔹 Adj Operating Income (cc): +4.8%–5.5% 🔹 Capex: ~3.5% of net sales

what's crazy about NVDA is their net margin. Almost twice the GOOG one. They make as much profit with half the revenue, roughly. You'd think it should be the opposite as they are selling hardware...

Lost 50% of my net worth this week. Gains back 5% today: STEAK!

Nvidia is now the second most profitable tech company with 32B net profit. Microsoft and Apple are now behind. And it will soon overthrow google

[$NVDA](https://x.com/search?q=%24NVDA&src=cashtag_click) Nvidia RESULTS: Q3 \- Q3 ebit $36.010B \- Q3 EPS $1.3 \- Q3 REV $57.006B vs. EST $54.660B \- Q3 gross margin 73.4% \- Q3 Net Income $31.910B \- Q3 ADJ EPS $1.3 vs. EST $1.24 Nvidia Earnings Notes: \- Outlook Q4 REV $65.000B

I've come to the realization 99% of the people here are poor and actually regarded and don't understand jack shit about what's going on. Myself included. Also that participation here is a net negative to our lives

I BET THE TOP 1% COMMENTERS IN HERE HAVE THE BOTTOM 1% NET WORTH. EMBARRASSING!

What kind of retard would have bought IBIT calls this week despite having the majority of their net worth in crypto already… couldn’t be me… right?!

bears look at their net worth and think it's the economy that's in bad shape 🤣

NVDA earnings gonna show a hell of a lot of unearned revenue sitting in liabilities while net profit is pretty much just expected. Nothing like what you'd expect from a company signing agreements with half of SPY...

“Tesla's market cap is noted as 1.34T with a 2024 net income of 7.15B” and musk will get $100 billions a year salary for next 10 years.

A couple of years ago FSLY had a major net outage. Stock was strong, until earnings reported that the outage caused them to lose some big clients. Analogous to NET? Who's to say?

I appear to have sized my gold puts incorrectly as they are currently quite destructive to my net worth

Call me a bull, but I think the net answer is good. The uncertainty will be over, and the market hates uncertainty.

Tesla marketcap: 1.34T Meta marketcap: 1.51T 2024 Meta Net Income After Taxes: 63.08B 2024 Tesla Net Income After Taxes: 7.15B

Every time the big orange opens his mouth and says "tariffs" the entire market tanks. On a chart of the SP500 YTD, you can see the April "liberation day" announcement from space. If Epstein files means he gets out, it'll be a net good just for the chance of certainty and predictability again.

GPU backed debt markets getting hard FUD tonight, tomorrow total useful life of gpu is like 2-3 yrs, these companies are stating 6yr inflating net income by 50% over stated values if burry is right, we're looking at a 50% haircut NVDA PT of 90 i did read an article about this GPU backed debt cycle last month and earlier this year corroborating sir burry's play https://tomtunguz.com/nvidia_nortel_vendor_financing_comparison/

dam u cassandra y u pulling rug tonight!: > “But it’s Baidu” > 2021:Useful life 4->5 years for servers > 2024: Useful life 5->6 years for servers > Took a RMB 16.2 billion impairment on RMB 30.1B net PPE. (over 50%) > Had RMB 8-11 billion cap ex each of last 4 years, and Depreciation RMB 6.8 billion in 2024 > In 2024, net income rose over 50% as a result of the useful life change. edit: https://x.com/michaeljburry/status/1990977620360430000?s=20

> My point is, if human labor is no longer needed, how will we make money? The answer is that society would have to evolve beyond a scarcity, transaction based economy. A robust social safety net ensures that the benefits of mass robotic and AI adoption are distributed to everyone and money ceases to have any meaning in regards to the necessities of life. Again, I think we're gonna see the cyberpunk hellhole future, not the Star Trek utopian one.

The volatility atleast lets me an opportunity to get out of some dumbass decision to chase VIX a few weeks ago, loading up on leveraged VIX etfs at the high, a decision immediately punished to a down 30% on paper ... but I have been able to engineer the position that I'll probably net out at even money, which is fine, whatever... don't chase the VIX!!!!!!!!!!!

Wdym dotcom net spending was going down?

so no bailout means when it falls, it ***really*** falls. In 2008, one in four households lost 75% or more of their net worth.

Usually contingent. So they cast a big net to catch one fish.

I lost 5% of my net worth. could be worse, right?

if you're ever feeling blue, just go look at one of those subs dedicated to bagholding a specific shitco. at least you're not the guy who got mindfucked by losing 90% of his net worth in 2 days on bean meat.

Not even joking, tee it high and let it rip. I’m not talking about the back net. I’m talking about the side net towards the back. Crazy part was there was an open dirt construction site next door so I think the lady was just BS’ing.

Confession: I hit a ball over the net at top golf and a week later I got a voicemail that someone had come in saying it hit their car. They tracked the ball to my account. Never called back obviously and nothing’s ever happened.

>>What exists now is a volatility-management regime, not a yield cap and not a price target. >>Yield rises reflect normalization, inflation expectations, and term premium. The BOJ’s JGB holdings lower net interest costs through rebate. Intermittent intervention ≠ YCC. >>Front-loading issuance affects supply, not the reaction function. And BOJ rollovers don’t pin yields either-they just maintain balance-sheet maturity while rebates keep Japan’s net interest cost low. Intermittent operations aren’t YCC; otherwise every central bank on Earth would be “doing YCC” by definition. >>Labeling all of that yield suppression is too broad to be useful. The post-2024 regime is a soft-guardrail system, not a cap. The current rise in JGB yields reflects normalization and term-premium returning, not a hidden peg.   > Front-loading issuance affects supply Which affects yields. They can easily drop issuance to lower levels. Due to inelastic demand from A&L matching, insurance companies, pensions, etc. yields would rapidly drop. >Intermittent operations aren’t YCC Yes it is. But I'm not even talking about intermittent operations which itself is a form a control to keep vigilantes in check, as the potential of intervention can be powerful. Simply having a balance sheet which rolls over into duration greater than outstanding drives down yields. The balance sheet like ours is so massive they can easily make adjustments to have yields wherever they want. >Labeling all of that yield suppression is too broad to be useful. Respectfully it's not too broad to be useful. Not recognizing that yields will stay in a range desired is what is not useful and very unproductive. Actually very misleading to investors who are not sophisticated enough to understand. It's wherever they want it. Just like yields in the US are YCC and roughly in the range the Fed and Treasury want it. >not a hidden peg. You're right, it's not so hidden de-pegging. The reality is that they have full control. If they *choose* not to that's because they have allowed it and are comfortable allowing it to rise due to inflation broadly becoming worse vs. the prior decade. But they can print or pull many levers to get yields down. u/JodoSzabo

No Net November